A Civic Pulse publication
The accountability feed

News

Vetted coverage of Governor Hochul's administration, grouped by day. Every item names its publication and carries a source-credibility tier — Tier 1 primary/wire, Tier 2 established outlet, Tier 3 secondary. No spin; each story links to its original source.

2 items

Aug 29, 2026

1
AM 1480 WLEA News (Brian O'Neil)TIER 3

Steuben County legislature will vote in September on letting Sheriff Allard join the 15 sheriffs suing over the 287(g) ban

Steuben County Sheriff Jim Allard wants to join Bourgault v. Hochul (No. 1:26-cv-01637, NDNY), the FAIR-backed suit by 15 sheriffs challenging the Local Cops, Local Crimes Act; the county legislature will vote at its September meeting on authorizing him. Steuben is one of the four counties AG James subpoenaed Aug 19 over 287(g) agreements. Hochul and James jointly called the suit "a frivolous waste of taxpayer dollars."

Aug 26, 2026

1
Federation for American Immigration Reform (press release via PR Newswire)TIER 3

FAIR names the sheriffs' case: Bourgault v. Hochul, No. 1:26-cv-01637 (N.D.N.Y.), with an emergency TRO motion and a Nov. 25 detention-contract deadline

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) announced on Aug. 26 that it is counsel to the fifteen sheriffs and identified the case as Bourgault et al. v. Hochul et al., No. 1:26-cv-01637 (N.D.N.Y.). The linked complaint and emergency motion PDFs are dated Aug. 25, 2026. The sheriffs seek a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against both the Local Cops, Local Crimes Act and the Attorney General's newly created Office of Immigrant Trust. Per the release, the motion asks the court to stop the state from voiding 287(g) agreements as of Aug. 25, 2026 and from forcing termination of federal detention housing agreements by Nov. 25, 2026 — that November date comes from the plaintiffs' filing and has not been confirmed against a state source. FAIR's Dale Wilcox and counsel Mateo Forero frame the claims as impairment of existing contracts and an intrusion on the constitutional authority of the elected sheriff; the release does not enumerate causes of action, name a judge, or state a hearing date, and no ruling on the TRO has been reported.