A Civic Pulse publication
Siena Research InstituteTier 1high

Siena: Hochul leads Blakeman 49-39 in first likely-voter poll — lead halved from June

Siena's first likely-voter poll of the cycle (811 LV, Aug 3-6, MOE +/-4.2) has Hochul up 49-39 — half her 52-32 June lead among registered voters. Blakeman leads the suburbs 49-41 and independents 45-40; Hochul leads NYC 64-19. Blakeman's favorability improved to 33-26, though 40% still don't know enough about him. Voters prefer Hochul on affordable housing (+16) and prices (+7); 52-25 support her data-center moratorium. Likely-voter screens typically tighten races, but this is the closest public head-to-head from a nonpartisan pollster this cycle.

Read the original
View at Siena Research Institute
campaignpollssienahochulblakemanlikely-voters
Related fact-checks
More on campaign
NY1 / State of Politics · Sep 30, 2026Blakeman pitches income-tax exemption for earners under $50K single / $100K joint (about $4,000 a year, paid for by redirecting immigrant and refugee aid); Hochul cites no income or corporate tax increases and her rebatesNYS Focus · Sep 30, 2026NYS Focus review finds Blakeman's matching-funds requests included more than 2,600 ineligible donations worth about $860K in potential match; the board did not answer questions about his contributionsNY1 / State of Politics · Sep 29, 2026Hochul campaign says it raised more than $8.5M in September, $5.9M of it for the state Democratic Party; figures are campaign-announced, not yet a BOE filingNew York Public News Network via WAMC (Jon Campbell) · Sep 25, 2026Hochul says she will campaign with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez at multiple events before Election Day as AOC starts a statewide tour; Blakeman says the more AOC campaigns for Hochul, the better his chances
Source: Siena Research Institute · Aug 12, 2026 · Credibility Tier 1 · Permalink https://reviewhochul.com/news/siena-likely-voter-poll-49-39-aug-2026

ReviewHochul aggregates and contextualizes published reporting. This page links to the original source; it is not a substitute for it.